Path: news.net.uni-c.dk!howland.erols.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc2.pa.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3AABD82E.C4D4E5CB@Home.Com> From: David Ness Organization: Mind/Matter X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets,comp.lang.apl,comp.lang.awk,comp.lang.basic,comp.lang.beta,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.dylan,comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Einstein's Riddle References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:55:11 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.3.108.59 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc2.pa.home.com 984340511 24.3.108.59 (Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:55:11 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:55:11 PST Xref: news.net.uni-c.dk comp.ai.neural-nets:67509 comp.lang.apl:29354 comp.lang.awk:17081 comp.lang.beta:12729 comp.lang.cobol:102465 comp.lang.dylan:24138 comp.lang.forth:78477 Steve Graham wrote: > > Who would be interested in using his/her brain (and his computer) to solve > the following? > > Steve Graham > > === > > Einstein's Riddle > > Albert Einstein wrote this riddle this century [ed. 20th century]. He said > 98% of the world could not solve it. > .... I can't speak for others, but this isn't much of a puzzle, and belongs to a category of puzzles that appear in low quality monthly puzzle magazines. The highest quality puzzles of this type used to appear regularly in Games Magazine, but I gave up reading that when Will Shortz departed for the Times Crosswords about a decade ago. I have nothing against puzzles, but it does strike me as being _very_ important to draw the line at only those of particular interest or of the highest quality. Mediochre puzzles are of _no_ interest to me, and do not accomplish what the last round associated with the `New Scientist' did, namely expose lots of different and contrasted technique.