Path: news.daimi.aau.dk!news.uni-c.dk!newsfeed.sunet.se!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!daresbury!yama.mcc.ac.uk!liv!strath-cs!nntp0.brunel.ac.uk!usenet From: Francesco Fantauzzi Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.beta,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.sather Subject: Re: What Should An Exception Handling Do? Date: 21 Mar 1996 13:53:37 GMT Organization: Brunel University Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4irn11$7ln@mimas.brunel.ac.uk> References: <1996Mar14.155641.4299@schbbs.mot.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: maths-pc-125.brunel.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) Xref: news.daimi.aau.dk comp.object:53056 comp.lang.eiffel:22451 comp.lang.c++:174475 comp.lang.beta:10674 comp.lang.java:27701 comp.lang.sather:12352 shang@corp.mot.com (David L. Shang) wrote: > > [...] >But, most exception handling mechanisms focus on the second case, >which makes exception handling very complicated for recovery. (C++ >even gives up recovery.) [...] ^^^^^------- This isn't really true (if I have understood what you mean). You can read a dissertation about that in "The Design and Evolution of C++", by B.S. Francesco G. Fantauzzi