Path: news.daimi.aau.dk!news.uni-c.dk!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!sunic!mn6.swip.net!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!news From: Wolfgang Ziller Newsgroups: comp.lang.beta Subject: Re: Adding methods without renaming the class Date: 26 Dec 1995 15:48:35 GMT Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4bp5gj$kp4@netnews.upenn.edu> References: <4aodps$70h@netnews.upenn.edu> <4b6p2p$dua@fbi-news.Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE> <4b9apo$aop@krone.daimi.aau.dk> <4bkilb$g47@netnews.upenn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts11-44.upenn.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) eernst@fraxinus.daimi.aau.dk (Erik Ernst) wrote: >I've neither experienced nor heard of such a limitation (ever). The > > myClass: (# <> ... #); > >method has worked just fine for at least five years, and probable long >before that. But there is a limitation (could that be what you've >read about?): You cannot add _substance_ to the instances of a pattern >through an attribute slot... OK, that's what the attributes vs. attributeDecl thing was about. Thanks for the clairification.