Newsgroups: comp.lang.beta,comp.lang.lisp Path: news.daimi.aau.dk!news.uni-c.dk!sunic!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!pipex!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!festival!edcogsci!jeff From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Subject: Re: Comparison: Beta - Lisp Message-ID: Sender: usenet@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (C News Software) Nntp-Posting-Host: bute.aiai.ed.ac.uk Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland References: Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1994 14:30:14 GMT Lines: 20 Xref: news.daimi.aau.dk comp.lang.beta:98 comp.lang.lisp:13373 In article lynbech@xenon.daimi.aau.dk (Christian Lynbech) writes: >>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Dalton writes: > >Jeff> In article >Jeff> schwartz@roke.cse.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) writes: >>> jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) writes: There was a Prolog a while >>> back that did better than C for some numeric stuff. Did this win >>> wupporters? Nooooooooooo... >>> >>> It's a necessary but not sufficient condition. > >Jeff> I'd say it's neither. > >Are we about to open the `C vs. Lisp' thread again, with BETA on the >side? There hasn't *been* a real Lisp vs C thread. There's been a Lisp-is-too-slow thread in which C has often featured as something sufficiently fast.