Path: news.daimi.aau.dk!news.uni-c.dk!sunic!news.funet.fi!sauna.cs.hut.fi!news.cs.hut.fi!Petri.Virkkula From: Petri.Virkkula@hut.fi (Petri Virkkula) Newsgroups: comp.lang.beta,comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Comparison: Beta - Lisp Date: 08 Sep 1994 16:25:35 GMT Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Lines: 21 Distribution: inet Message-ID: References: <34n2qe$d74@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: delta.hut.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In-reply-to: haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de's message of 8 Sep 1994 13:15:58 GMT Xref: news.daimi.aau.dk comp.lang.beta:8 comp.lang.lisp:13135 On 8 Sep 1994 13:15:58 GMT, haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de (Bruno Haible) said: Bruno> Since a new language called BETA is gaining attention, which Bruno> has some features Lisp is proud of, I attempt a comparison Bruno> between Beta and Lisp. I understand that this group is dedicated for BETA but if subject says "Comparison: Beta - Lisp". I didn't find too much comparison, I found mostly list of features that are common in both languges. It would be nice if somebody posted real comparison, as atleast only thing I know about Beta is that it has "pattern"s. Petri -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petri Virkkula | Internet: Petri.Virkkula@hut.fi JMT 11 E 125 | X.400 : /G=Petri/S=Virkkula/O=hut/ADMD=fumail/C=fi/ 02150 Espoo | Voice : +358 0 455 1277 FINLAND | --------------------------------------------------------------------------